Riscaldamento globale o bugia colossale?
Nonostante gli estremismi catastrofisti stiamo prendendo sempre più consciousness that man is not able to change the climate of the planet so important.
Many scientists around the world challenge the official data on global warming. There is no doubt that in recent years there has been a rise in temperature, the point, however, is that even in the '30s, there were periods of extremely hot, even more than those at the turn of 21 th and 22 th century. So, given that courses and resorts are part of a natural trend, we may in part explain these apparent anomalies. It also demonstrated the inadequacy of many sensors officers, perhaps because only places where years ago there was the same urbanization. Where this is not enough, I could give other examples that can lead to doubt. The main one is that the Sun is definitely in a phase of great activity, so that, compared with a modest increase in global temperature, are reflected even more indicative data about other planets in our Solar System. So we discover that part of the Martian polar ice caps have melted, the temperature of Jupiter is rising so much that you get a hurricane yet another semi-permanent Sud.Certo Hemisphere, Earth, miracle (I do not think only one) of the Galaxy , readily undergoes less heating, which is why it is so well developed life. But why, then, the official figures, the ones that no one can challenge, do not consider this? Because if the earth's history has seen, as is assumed, four total melting of polar ice caps, a temperature higher than the present and certainly a much greater concentration of greenhouse gases is not taken into account for this? Why, instead of stimulating debate, you silence the dissident voices? Things, as history has taught us, are never as they seem. Wars are fought not out of altruism, the logic of power and power itself is far from what we are being fed. In reality how many things we know really, how many things we have "proof"? The assumptions for which he hastily married the theory of anthropogenic global warming also pass by again how it is spent by governments in the business of the biology and ecology (sometimes not even more unsustainable ecological). We may, under the new agreements, rather than pollute less, buy pollution rights from companies that do not reach the threshold of production of CO2. We may borrow, on behalf of an ecological conscience instilled by those who have ruined the planet with the logic of unbridled capitalism. One of the many modern dogmas, I also think the bogeyman of terrorism, which has undermined our security, especially as the mass media have, in their first and foremost, terror, and as anti-democratic laws were permitted because of this fear. The fear, of course, which our society is fed against his will, as it is devoid of strong roots, and the best way to force solutions that are real or fictitious.
0 comments:
Post a Comment