"Because I do and do not you?"
It's been about a month and a half from the novel and have been other than the feedback that readers, especially those who have spoken to me personally, I have highlighted. The thing that gave me the most satisfaction is was definitely one to watch and listen to people who have commented on different issues, reflecting the fact that "thirty and praise" is a book across, capable of teasing the thoughts of many on many issues. Honestly, this result for me was one of the greatest satisfaction.
Those who try to write and then have the chance to publish even knows that their thoughts, their dreams and ideas will be challenged by those who then decide to browse and read that text. I knew then what could be the consequences of my words or my thoughts, but even so I went ahead because I believe that freedom of thought sia un valore, anche se la nostra società vive costantemente in trincea, alla ricerca dell’abbattimento del nemico che non la pensa come noi. Il nostro è il paese dei Guelfi e dei Ghibellini, dei Berlusconiani e degli anti-Berlusconiani, oppure, per riprendere una metafora a me cara, per qualsiasi tema sembriamo tutti degli ultrà allo stadio: la ragione sta sempre dalla nostra parte e l’avversario contrapposto ha per definizione torto e deve essere a tutti i costi demonizzato.
Quando ho deciso di evidenziare alcune situazioni curiose ed ingiuste presenti nel mio mondo lavorativo (l’università), lo stesso che mi ha fatto crescere, che mi ha regalato una stabilità remunerativa e sociale, non lo ho fatto certo per ingratitudine o per un becero moralismo. Ho deciso invece di esprimere alcune considerazioni, giuste o sbagliate che siano, per mettere in discussione un sistema che ha ancora grandi margini di miglioramento.
Io credo infatti che “chi di morale ferisce poi di morale perisce” e io sono il primo infatti ad inserirmi nel lungo elenco dei dipendenti pubblici non privi di macchia, ma questo non vuol dire che non si possano manifestare le proprie idee su un mondo ovattato che ha come difetto più grande quello di NON ESSERE GOVERNATO E CONTROLLATO.
Il pianeta del pubblico impiego si basa su “migliaia di cavilli normativi” e allo stesso tempo di “zero controlli zero and punishments, "and its elements, namely, U.S. employees, we often sail this sea of \u200b\u200bcontradictions with ease, managing to get the maximum benefit of observing the often absurd prescriptions of the law.
But there is one thing that absolutely can not stand, and maybe it was just this spark that light the fire within me: the non-respect of others.
How often do we happen to be neatly lined up at the post office, bank or cash in a shopping mall and see a mischievous (I use that word because I would not censor) and with a lame excuse or even natural silence with indifference and skip the long wait is projected to the initiation of the tail. Or how many times has happened to us a phenomenon (as above) which, although coming after us, we care the only empty seat in the car going the wrong direction and anticipating the time, thus making the risk of missing the train or bus ... Then , finally found a space to park far away, run without breathing altered towards our goal and just comes in quell'instante genius last minute, which, parking space for the disabled at 50 meters from the railway station or bus stop, makes quite a view that uses the pass perhaps the parent or grandparent, and walks quietly combed and fresh to its destination.
I could go with an endless list, but the question I continually ask myself is this: "Why yes you and not me?"
The answers can be many: "I am as c + - + +-and "," We are children of a poor society "or" wrong men by nature "else" happens to everyone to try it, it happens to you too! Do not be shocked, "and why not" Opportunity makes the thief. " All answers true and unquestionable, but if we change the society in which we live we must start from the foundations that are represented by respect for others.
In a nutshell what I try to explain is that in a community of people (family, a group of friends, a condominium, a neighborhood, a city and why not, a work environment) is crucial in respect of rules mainly out of respect for others, to succeed in building a balanced ecosystem, without envy, resentment and injustice. So the question that each of us should ask is not "so that you and not me?" But "WHY ME AND YOU NO Yes?".
Each of us, in different contexts and situations, it may be holding powers or tools that can promote individually without causing harm to those who live within our own group or community. But because "Yes, and you do not I?". I believe that many of the problems of our society stem from their non-response to this question. From the head of a government to last the citizens, no one can give resolution to this question.
Alberto
0 comments:
Post a Comment