... and the limits of self-organization of proletarian
Fabrizio Bernardi (2011)
[The following text, while being largely the result of individual processing, should not a little to the ongoing discussion, within the aggregation informally called "The bad side" .]
"The revolution is not a problem of organization"
(Jean Barrot, Capitalism and Communism )
1. The rejection of trade union practice is, without doubt, an essential step for any criticism of the existing theoretical and practical supposedly "radical". However, if you do not articulated analysis of the mechanisms that are behind the 'form- integration of trade union within the state and dynamics of capitalist , criticism mere likelihood of dilution in ideological stance.
analysis which we allude, was drafted for the first time in the 20s and 30s of last century, by the left spills or expelled from the Communist Third International (or at least one of them), demonstrating that it is not at all a new phenomenon . In contrast, the beginnings of what looks like a slow process involution, spread over a few decades, and whose bureaucracy is only one of the symptoms, can be traced back in some areas advanced capitalist, even the late nineteenth century, when there was a partial initial legalization of trade unions . The fact that in 1914, almost all the unions support without hesitation the war effort of their respective nation states involved in the carnage of the First World War, says a lot about already reached advanced stage at that time, the integration process.
The point we want to emphasize, however, è che quest'ultimo fu il frutto non tanto di un presunto “tradimento” delle dirigenze riformiste; quanto, piuttosto, di un'evoluzione – implicita nella natura stessa della forma-sindacato – determinata dallo sviluppo capitalistico (passaggio dal dominio formale al dominio reale del capitale sul lavoro e sulla società)...
[ Qui si possono leggere alcune critiche al testo e le relative risposte]
0 comments:
Post a Comment